Please report any issues on the git page of the package.

Most background and details can be found in the book by Mogens Bladt and Bo Friis Nielsen (2017): Matrix-Exponential Distributions in Applied Probability, and the PhD dissertation by Campillo Navarro (2019).

Phase-type distributions are a general class of distributions. They have been used extensively in fields like insurance mathematics, queuing theory and population genetics.

The basic idea is to consider a Markov jump process (or a Markov chain for discrete time) with \(p\) transient states and one absorbing state. The time to absorption is phase-type distributed. The parameters of a phase-type distribution is thus an intensity matrix and the initial probabilities to begin in each state. The matrix form of the phase-type distribution allow great simplification, in particular to find the moments of the time before reaching the absorbing state.

The package `PhaseTypeR`

handle and manipulate the continuous and discrete phase-type distributions, and their corresponding reward transformations and multivariate extensions.

The package is general, but our initial interest in phase-type distributions is from applications in population genetics. We provide a separate vignette where we further demonstrate **PhaseTypeR** using applications from population genetics.

The functions provided by `PhaseTypeR`

require objects of class `disc_phase_type`

, `cont_phase_type`

, `mult_disc_phase_type`

or `mult_cont_phase_type`

, which can be obtained using the generator functions `PH()`

, `DPH()`

, `MPH()`

and `MDPH()`

, respectively.

Here is an example of a univariate continuous phase-type distribution:

```
subintensity_matrix <- matrix(c(-1.5, 0, 0,
1.5, -1, 0,
0, 1, -0.5), ncol = 3)
initial_probabilities <- c(0.9, 0.1, 0)
ph <- PH(subintensity_matrix, initial_probabilities)
ph
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0
#> [2,] 0.0 -1.0 1.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.5
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.9 0.1 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "cont_phase_type"
```

Here `subint_mat`

is the sub-intensity matrix and `init_probs`

is the vector of initial probabilities.

An object of one of the phase-type classes always has a sub-intensity matrix, an initial probability vector, a defect (the probability of starting directly in the absorbing state, which can happen when using reward transformations (see Section~4)), and the type of class.

We can also print a summary of the object:

```
summary(ph)
#>
#> Subintensity matrix:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0
#> [2,] 0.0 -1.0 1.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.5
#>
#> Initial probabilities:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.9 0.1 0
#>
#> Defect:
#> [1] 0
#>
#> Mean: 3.6
#>
#> Variance: 5.44
```

The `init_probs`

argument is optional. If not provided, the probability beginning in the first state will be set to 1, that is, \(\boldsymbol{\pi} = (1,\, 0,\, 0,\, ...\,,0)\). In this case the generator function will print a warning:

```
subintensity_matrix <- matrix(c(-1.5, 0, 0,
1.5, -1, 0,
0, 1, -0.5), ncol = 3)
PH(subintensity_matrix)
#> Warning in check_phase_type(subint_mat, init_probs):
#> The initial probability vector is automatically generated.
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0
#> [2,] 0.0 -1.0 1.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.5
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 1 0 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "cont_phase_type"
```

This is the reason we take the subintensity matrix as the first entry in the function.

Let \(\{X_t\}_{t\ge0}\) be a **Markov jump process** with \(p\) transient states and one absorbing state. If \(\tau\) is defined as the time when \(\{X_t\}_{t\ge0}\) reaches the absorbing state, then \(\tau\) follows a continuous phase-type distribution \(\tau \sim PH(, \boldsymbol{\pi},\boldsymbol{T})\), where \(\boldsymbol{T}\) is the sub-intensity matrix of the corresponding Markov jump process, and \(\boldsymbol{\pi}\) is the vector of initial probabilities.

As specified before, a continuous phase-type distribution object can be created in `PhaseTypeR`

using the `PH()`

function:

```
subintensity_matrix <- matrix(c(-1.5, 0, 0,
1.5, -1, 0,
0, 1, -0.5), ncol = 3)
initial_probabilities <- c(0.9, 0.1, 0)
ph <- PH(subintensity_matrix, initial_probabilities)
ph
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0
#> [2,] 0.0 -1.0 1.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.5
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.9 0.1 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "cont_phase_type"
```

We can easily plot the phase-type distribution as a network by first converting the phase-type object into a graph, and then plotting it:

```
net <- phase_type_to_network(ph)
set.seed(8)
plot(net, edge.curved=.1, edge.label = E(net)$weight,
edge.color = ifelse(as_data_frame(net, what="edges")$from == 'V0',
'purple', 'grey'))
```

In the above graph the initial probabilities are represented as purple arrows, while rates are represented by gray arrows.

In the continuous case, we can also plot the transition probability matrix at time t as a graph:

```
par(mfrow=c(2,3), mar=c(2,2,2,2))
set.seed(6)
for (i in c(0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20)) {
net <- phase_type_to_network(ph, i)
plot(net, edge.arrow.size=0.5, edge.curved=.1, edge.label = E(net)$weight, main=paste0('time = ', i),
edge.color = ifelse(as_data_frame(net, what="edges")$from == 'V0',
'purple', 'grey'))
}
```

`par(oldpar)`

The mean of a continuous phase-type distribution is provided in **Theorem 3.1.16** and **Corollary 3.1.18** in (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.135)

\[
\mathbb{E} (\tau) = \boldsymbol{\pi} (-\boldsymbol{T})^{-1} \boldsymbol{e},
\] and from **Corollary 3.1.18** (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.135), the higher order moments are given by

\[ \mathbb{E} (\tau^n) = n!\boldsymbol{\pi} (-\boldsymbol{T})^{-n} \boldsymbol{e}, \quad n=1,2,\ldots. \]

From this formula we find the variance

\[ \mathbb{V} (\tau) = \mathbb{E} (\tau^2)-\mathbb{E} (\tau)^2= (2\boldsymbol{\pi} (-\boldsymbol{T})^{-2} \boldsymbol{e}) -(\boldsymbol{\pi} (-\boldsymbol{T})^{-1} \boldsymbol{e})^2. \]

Calculating the mean and variance of a phase-type distributed random variable is straightforward in `PhaseTypeR`

. We can do so by using the generic functions `mean()`

and `var()`

on a `cont_phase_type`

object. For example:

```
cat('\n', 'Mean: ',mean(ph),'\n')
#>
#> Mean: 3.6
cat(' Variance: ',var(ph),'\n \n')
#> Variance: 5.44
#>
```

These two quantities are also printed when using the `summary()`

function:

```
summary(ph)
#>
#> Subintensity matrix:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0
#> [2,] 0.0 -1.0 1.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.5
#>
#> Initial probabilities:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.9 0.1 0
#>
#> Defect:
#> [1] 0
#>
#> Mean: 3.6
#>
#> Variance: 5.44
```

**The probability density function** (PDF) of a continuous phase-type distribution is provided in **Theorem 3.1.7** (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.~131)

\[
f(u) = \boldsymbol{\pi}e^{\boldsymbol{T}u}\boldsymbol{t}, \quad u\ge0,
\] where \(\boldsymbol{t} = -\boldsymbol{T}\boldsymbol{e}\) is the exit rate vector of the sub-intensity matrix (the vector of rates from state \(i\) to the absorbing state). The **cumulative distribution function** (CDF) is

\[ F(u) = 1-\boldsymbol{\pi}e^{\boldsymbol{T}u}\boldsymbol{e}, \quad u\ge0. \]

We calculate the PDF and the CDF with `dPH()`

and `pPH()`

, respectively,

```
x <- seq(0,8,length.out = 100)
pdf <- dPH(x, ph)
{plot(x, pdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "PDF", col = "blue",
type = 'l', lwd=2)
title('Probability density function (PDF)')}
```

```
x <- seq(0,8,length.out = 100)
cdf <- pPH(x, ph)
{plot(x, cdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "CDF", col = "orange",
type = 'l', lwd=2)
title('Cumulative density function (CDF)')
}
```

Additionally, we can compute the quantile function using `qPH()`

:

```
x <- seq(0.05, 0.95, 0.01)
{plot(x, qPH(x, ph), col = "green", type="l", lwd=2, xlim=c(0,1),
ylab = "Time to absorbtion", xlab = "Quantile")
title('Quantile function')}
```

We can also make random draws from the phase-type distribution using `rPH()`

:

```
cat('10 random samples: \n', rPH(5, ph), '\n', rPH(5, ph))
#> 10 random samples:
#> 3.162411 1.325381 2.67847 0.8816998 4.542533
#> 1.044944 9.829242 5.278639 1.063361 1.689269
```

Here is a histogram of 200 samples from the phase-type distribution:

```
set.seed(6)
tab_FullPH <- rFullPH(ph)
x <- c(tab_FullPH$time, sum(tab_FullPH$time)/length(tab_FullPH$time))
x <- cumsum(x)
y <- c(tab_FullPH$state, 4)
plot(x,y,type="n", xlim=c(0,x[length(x)]))
segments(c(0,x[-length(x)]),y,x,y)
points(c(0,x[-length(x)]),y,pch=16)
points(x[-length(x)],y[-length(x)],pch=1)
points(x[length(x)],y[length(x)],pch='>')
```

Instead of using a Markov Jump Process (also sometimes called a continuous time Markov chain), it is also possible to consider a discrete **Markov chain (MC)**. Let’s consider \(\tau \sim DPH(\boldsymbol{\pi},\boldsymbol{T})\). Here \(\tau\) is the number of state transitions before entering the absorbing state. The sub-intensity matrix \(\boldsymbol{T}\) contains the probabilities of jumping from one state to another.

Discrete phase-type distributions can be created in `PhaseTypeR`

using the `DPH()`

function by specifying a sub-intensity matrix that meets the requirements for a discrete phase-type distribution:

```
subintensity_matrix <- matrix(c(0, 0.2, 0.8,
0.5, 0.5, 0,
0, 0, 0.4), ncol = 3, byrow = T)
initial_probabilities <- c(0.7, 0.3, 0)
dph <- DPH(subintensity_matrix, initial_probabilities)
dph
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.0 0.2 0.8
#> [2,] 0.5 0.5 0.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 0.4
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.7 0.3 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "disc_phase_type"
```

We can also plot discrete phase-type functions the same way as continuous ones:

```
net <- phase_type_to_network(dph)
set.seed(8)
plot(net, edge.curved=.1, edge.label = E(net)$weight)
```

The moments are given by **Proposition 2.7.iii** (Campillo Navarro 2019, p.12)

\[ \mathbb{E} (\tau(\tau - 1) \cdots (\tau-(n-1))) = n!\boldsymbol{\pi T}^{n-1} (\boldsymbol{I}-\boldsymbol{T})^{-n} \boldsymbol{e}, \quad n=1,2,\ldots. \]

This leads to a mean and variance given by

\[ \mathbb{E} (\tau) = \boldsymbol{\pi}(\boldsymbol{I}-\boldsymbol{T})^{-1}\boldsymbol{e}, \quad \] \[ \mathbb{E} (\tau(\tau-1))= 2\boldsymbol{\pi}\boldsymbol{T}(\boldsymbol{I}-\boldsymbol{T})^{-2}\boldsymbol{e}, \quad \] \[ \mathbb{V} (\tau) = \mathbb{E} (\tau(\tau-1)) + \mathbb{E} (\tau) - \mathbb{E} (\tau)^2. \]

In `PhaseTypeR`

the mean and variance of a discrete phase-type distribution can be obtained using the generic functions `mean()`

and `var()`

:

```
cat('\n', 'Mean: ',mean(dph),'\n')
#>
#> Mean: 4.016667
cat(' Variance: ',var(dph),'\n \n')
#> Variance: 5.863611
#>
```

**Theorem 1.2.58 and 1.2.59** in (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.30) provides the probability distribution of a discrete phase-type distribution

\[ \mathbb{P}(\tau=n) = \boldsymbol{\pi T}^{n-1}\boldsymbol{t}, \quad n=1,2,\ldots, \]

and the cumulative distribution function is

\[ F_\tau(n) = 1-\boldsymbol{\pi T}^{n}\boldsymbol{e}, \quad n=1,2,\ldots. \]

As for the continuous case, it is possible to investigate the probability distribution and cumulative distribution by using a similar set of functions, namely `dDPH`

and `pDPH`

:

```
x <- seq(0,10,by=1)
pdf <- dDPH(x, dph)
{plot(x, pdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "PDF and CDF", col = "blue",
type = 'l', lwd=2)
title('Probability function (PDF)')}
```

```
x <- seq(0,10,by=1)
cdf <- pDPH(x, dph)
{plot(x, cdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "CDF", col = "orange",
type = 'l', lwd=2)
title('Probability function (CDF)')}
```

Similarly, we have a function for the quantile (`qDPH`

)

```
x <- seq(0.05, 0.95, 0.01)
{plot(x, qDPH(x, dph), col = "green",
ylab = "Time to absorption",
xlab = "Quantile",xlim=c(0,1),ylim=c(0,10),type="l")
title('Quantile function')}
```

Finally, here is a histogram of 200 samples from the phase-type distribution drawn from `rDPH``:

A phase-type distributed variable is the sum of the times spent in each state of the underlying Markov chain before absorption. A reward transformed PH-type distribution is the accumulation of the reward-weighted times spent in each state before absorption.

Let \(\tau \sim PH(\boldsymbol{\pi},\boldsymbol{T})\) and let \(\{X_t\}_{t \ge 0}\) denote the underlying Markov jump process. Furthermore, let the reward vector be \(\boldsymbol{r} = (r_1,\ r_2,\ ...\,,\ r_p) \in \mathbb{R}^p_+\).

We can then define the new variable

\[ Y = \int^\tau_0 r(X_t)dt, \]

which corresponds to the accumulated reward-weighted time before absorption (or the reward earned before absorption). From **Theorem 3.1.33** (Bladt and Nielsen 2017) it follows that this new variable is also continuous phase-type distributed

\[ Y \sim PH(\boldsymbol{\pi}^\star,\boldsymbol{T}^\star). \]

If the rewards are strictly positive we have \(\boldsymbol{\pi}^\star\) = \(\boldsymbol{\pi}\) and \(\boldsymbol{T}^\star\) = \(\triangle(\boldsymbol{1/r})\boldsymbol{T}\).

Taking the previous example and applying a reward vector \(\boldsymbol{r} = (1,\ 2,\ 3)\), the continuous phase-type distribution is reward-transformed in `PhaseTypeR`

using `reward_phase_type()`

:

```
rwd.ph <- reward_phase_type(ph, c(1, 2, 3))
print(rwd.ph)
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0000000
#> [2,] 0.0 -0.5 0.5000000
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.1666667
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.9 0.1 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "cont_phase_type"
```

```
x <- seq( 0 , 20 ,length.out = 100)
pdf <- dPH(x,ph)
rwd.pdf <- dPH(x,rwd.ph)
{plot(x, pdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "pdf", col = "orange", type = 'l')
lines(x, rwd.pdf, col = "blue")
title('Distribution functions before and after reward transformation')
legend("topright", legend=c('Original Phase-type', 'Reward transformed Phase-type'),
col=c("orange", "blue"), lty=1,bty="n")}
```

In the discrete phase-type distribution, the reward transformation can be achieved using intermediate states as presented by Navarro (2019).

Let \(\tau \sim DPH(\boldsymbol{\pi},\boldsymbol{T})\) and let \(\{X_n\}_{n \ge 0}\) be the underlying Markov chain, and the reward vector \(\boldsymbol{r} = (r_1,\ r_2,\ ...\,,\ r_p) \in \mathbb{N}\). We define the reward-transformed variable by

\[ Y = \sum_{n=1}^{\tau - 1} r(X_n). \]

Using the same discrete phase-type distribution as previously, we can reward-transform the distribution using \(\boldsymbol{r} = (1,\ 2,\ 3)\)

```
rwd.dph <- reward_phase_type(dph, c(1, 2, 3))
print(rwd.dph)
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> [1,] 0.0 0.2 0 0.8 0 0
#> [2,] 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0
#> [3,] 0.5 0.5 0 0.0 0 0
#> [4,] 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0
#> [5,] 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1
#> [6,] 0.0 0.0 0 0.4 0 0
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> [1,] 0.7 0.3 0 0 0 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "disc_phase_type"
```

```
x <- seq(0,20,by=1)
pdf <- dDPH(x, dph)
rwd.pdf <- dDPH(x, rwd.dph)
{plot(x, pdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "pdf", col = "orange",
type = 'l', lwd=2)
lines(x, rwd.pdf, col = "blue",lwd=2)
title('Distribution functions before and after reward transformation')
legend("topright", bty="n", legend=c('Original DPH', 'Reward transformed DPH'),
col=c("orange", "blue"), lty=1, lwd=2)}
```

A non-negative reward transformation of a phase-type distribution is also phase-type distributed (possibly with a defect). **Theorem 3.1.33** (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.147) gives the non-negative reward-transformed phase-type distribution.

Here is one example:

```
reward_phase_type(ph, c(0, 2, 3))
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] -0.5 0.5000000
#> [2,] 0.0 -0.1666667
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 1 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "cont_phase_type"
```

A more detailed example is as follows:

```
rwd.ph <- reward_phase_type(ph, c(2, 0, 0))
print(rwd.ph)
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1]
#> [1,] -0.75
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.9
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0.1
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "cont_phase_type"
```

```
x <- seq( 0 , 20 ,length.out = 100)
cdf <- pPH(x,ph)
rwd.cdf <- pPH(x,rwd.ph)
{plot(x, cdf, xlab = "Time to absorption", ylab = "pdf", col = "orange", type = 'l',ylim=c(0,1))
lines(x, rwd.cdf, col = "blue")
title('Cumulative distributions before and after reward transformation')
legend("bottomright", legend=c('Original Phase-type', 'Reward transformed Phase-type'),
col=c("orange", "blue"), lty=1,bty="n")}
```

Let’s apply a reward of \(\boldsymbol{r} = (0,\ 2,\ 3)\) to the discrete phase-type example. We can do it in two separate steps. First, we remove those states with a null reward:

```
zero_dph <- reward_phase_type(dph, c(0, 1, 1))
print(zero_dph)
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 0.6 0.4
#> [2,] 0.0 0.4
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 0.44 0.56
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 1.110223e-16
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "disc_phase_type"
```

Because of the computational approximation on matrix calculation, the defect is slightly positive but it is effectively zero.

Then, the positive rewards can be applied to each of the remaining states to create a new discrete phase-type distribution:

```
reward_phase_type(zero_dph, c(2, 3))
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.0 1 0.0 0 0
#> [2,] 0.6 0 0.4 0 0
#> [3,] 0.0 0 0.0 1 0
#> [4,] 0.0 0 0.0 0 1
#> [5,] 0.0 0 0.4 0 0
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.44 0 0.56 0 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 1.110223e-16
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "disc_phase_type"
```

These two steps can be unified into the same line of code by directly specifying the \(\boldsymbol{r} = (0,\ 2,\ 3)\) reward vector:

```
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.0 1 0.0 0 0
#> [2,] 0.6 0 0.4 0 0
#> [3,] 0.0 0 0.0 1 0
#> [4,] 0.0 0 0.0 0 1
#> [5,] 0.0 0 0.4 0 0
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.44 0 0.56 0 0
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 1.110223e-16
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "disc_phase_type"
```

For further details see **Section 8.1** in (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.438).

Let \(\tau \sim PH_p(\boldsymbol{\pi},\boldsymbol{T})\) with \(\{X_t\}_{t \ge 0}\) the underlying Markov jump process. Consider \(n\) non-negative reward functions \(r_j:\{1,\ldots,p\}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_+\) and collect them in the matrix \(\boldsymbol{R}\) of size \(p\times n\) such that column \(j\) corresponds to reward function \(r_j\), i.e. \(r_j(i)=\boldsymbol{R}_{ij}\). Define \(Y_j\) by

\[ Y_j = \int_0^\tau r_j(X_t)dt, \; \quad j=1,\ldots,n. \] We say that \(\boldsymbol{Y} = (Y_1,\ Y_2,\ ...\,,\ Y_n)\) is multivariate phase-type distributed and write \(\boldsymbol{Y} \sim MPH^*(\boldsymbol{T},\ \boldsymbol{\pi},\ \boldsymbol{R})\).

The `MPH()`

function with the reward matrix in the `reward_mat`

parameter defines the multivariate phase-type distribution.

```
Rmat <- matrix(c(0, 1, 1, 2,
2, 1, 5, 2,
0, 1, 10, 2), nrow = 3, ncol=4, byrow=TRUE)
mph <- MPH(ph$subint_mat, ph$init_probs, reward_mat = Rmat)
print(mph)
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] -1.5 1.5 0.0
#> [2,] 0.0 -1.0 1.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 -0.5
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.9 0.1 0
#>
#> $reward_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] 0 1 1 2
#> [2,] 2 1 5 2
#> [3,] 0 1 10 2
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "mult_cont_phase_type"
```

The mean of each reward transformed multivariate vector is given by

```
mean(mph)
#> [1] 2.0 3.6 25.6 7.2
```

From **Theorem 8.1.5** (Bladt and Nielsen 2017, 81:p.440), the bivariate first-order moments of the variables in the \(MPH^*\) distribution are given by

\[ \mathbb{E}(Y_j Y_k) = \boldsymbol{\pi U \Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)\boldsymbol{Ur}_k + \boldsymbol{\pi U \Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)\boldsymbol{Ur}_i, \]

and it is straightforward to calculate the covariance using

\[ \mathrm{Cov}(Y_j Y_k) = \mathbb{E}(Y_j Y_k) - \mathbb{E}(Y_j)\mathbb{E}(Y_k) \]

The variance-covariance matrix is computed in `PhaseTypeR`

using `var`

```
var(mph)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] 4 2.00 10.00 4.00
#> [2,] 2 5.44 45.44 10.88
#> [3,] 10 45.44 425.44 90.88
#> [4,] 4 10.88 90.88 21.76
```

The discrete multivariate phase-type (MDPH) distribution is constructed similar to the continuous multivariate phase-type distribution, but in discrete time. Details are available in **Section 5.2** (Campillo Navarro 2019, p.79). Let \(\tau \sim {\rm DPH}(\pi,T)\) and let \(\{X_m\}\) be the underlying Markov chain. We write \(\boldsymbol{Y} = (Y_1,\ Y_2,\ ...\,,\ Y_n)\) for the MDPH-distributed vector where \(Y_j\) corresponds to

\[
Y_j = \sum_{m=0}^{\tau-1} r_j(X_m), \quad j=1,\ldots,n.
\] Using the `MDPH()`

function with the reward matrix in the `reward_mat`

parameter we get

```
Rmat <- matrix(c(0, 1, 1, 2,
2, 1, 5, 2,
0, 1, 10, 2), nrow = 3, ncol=4, byrow=TRUE)
mdph <- MDPH(dph$subint_mat, dph$init_probs, reward_mat = Rmat)
print(mdph)
#> $subint_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.0 0.2 0.8
#> [2,] 0.5 0.5 0.0
#> [3,] 0.0 0.0 0.4
#>
#> $init_probs
#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] 0.7 0.3 0
#>
#> $reward_mat
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] 0 1 1 2
#> [2,] 2 1 5 2
#> [3,] 0 1 10 2
#>
#> $defect
#> [1] 0
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "mult_disc_phase_type"
```

The mean of each reward transformed multivariate vector is given by

```
mean(mdph)
#> [1] 2.200000 4.016667 23.416667 8.033333
```

From **Proposition 5.7** (Campillo Navarro 2019, p.85) the bivariate first-order moments of the variables in the \(MDPH^*\) distribution are given by

\[ \mathbb{E}(Y_j Y_k) = \boldsymbol{\pi} \left\{\boldsymbol{U\Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)\boldsymbol{U\Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_k) + \boldsymbol{U\Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_k)\boldsymbol{U\Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) - \boldsymbol{U\Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)\boldsymbol{\Delta}(\boldsymbol{r}_k)\right\}\boldsymbol{e}, \]

and it is straightforward to calculate the covariance using

\[ \mathrm{Cov}(Y_j Y_k) = \mathbb{E}(Y_j Y_k) - \mathbb{E}(Y_j)\mathbb{E}(Y_k). \]

In `PhaseTypeR`

the variance-covariance matrix is computed using `var()`

. In this case we get

```
var(mdph)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] 12.76 7.630000 33.15000 15.26000
#> [2,] 7.63 5.863611 31.12361 11.72722
#> [3,] 33.15 31.123611 197.42361 62.24722
#> [4,] 15.26 11.727222 62.24722 23.45444
```

It can be useful to have information about the full sample path for the underlying Markov chain. Such information is also available in our package.

```
set.seed(42)
rFullPH(ph)
#> state time
#> 1 2 0.1983368
#> 2 3 0.0763838
set.seed(42)
rFullDPH(dph)
#> state time
#> 1 2 2
#> 2 1 1
#> 3 2 4
#> 4 1 1
#> 5 3 2
set.seed(42)
rFullMPH(mph)
#> state time reward_1 reward_2 reward_3 reward_4
#> 1 2 0.1983368 0.3966736 0.1983368 0.9916841 0.3966736
#> 2 3 0.0763838 0.0000000 0.0763838 0.7638380 0.1527676
set.seed(42)
rFullMDPH(mdph)
#> state time reward_1 reward_2 reward_3 reward_4
#> 1 2 2 4 2 10 4
#> 2 1 1 0 1 1 2
#> 3 2 4 8 4 20 8
#> 4 1 1 0 1 1 2
#> 5 3 2 0 2 20 4
```

Bladt, Mogens, and Bo Friis Nielsen. 2017. *Matrix-Exponential Distributions in Applied Probability*. Vol. 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7049-0.